University of House Hindu Religion Course Controversy Academic Freedom Debate Student Protest Hindu Phobia

Freedom of expression: The University of Houston of Houston has given clarification about the controversy arising on its curriculum called ‘Live Hindu Religion’. The university said that it gives importance to academic freedom and teachers are given complete freedom to consider complex and sensitive topics. This statement came when a student objected to the content of the syllabus and called it ‘Hinduphobic’.

Following the complaint of the student, the Dean of the University and the Director of the Department of Religious Studies reviewed it and discussed the subject with the teacher. The university clarified that this course is based on the principles of religious studies in which specific terminology is used to understand different religions and their traditions. The university said that words like ‘Fundamentalism’ are used to explain the historical and social processes of all religions and not for criticism of any religion.

Cleaning of Professor Ulleri

Professor Aaron Michael Ulleri, who taught this course, also reacted to the controversy. He said that his aim is to explain different forms of Hinduism and not limit it in any one definition. He insisted that his syllabus widely covers the historical and social aspects of Hinduism, which includes a journey from its origin to the present.

Professor clarification on Hinduism and Hindutva

Professor Ulleri clarified that Hinduism incorporates many different traditions and beliefs. He said that the word ‘Hindu’ was not found in Indian Sanskrit literature in ancient times but it developed as a geographical and cultural identity. He also said that ‘Hindutva’ emerged as a political ideology in 1922 and its historical aspects are impartially taught in the curriculum.